Home banner
A-Z Index

Quick way to the find the information that you need...

More button
Register with FRAME

Although you do not need to register, any information you provide will be confidential and used only by FRAME to improve the website

Register button
Account Login
Forgot password?

The Journal


Alternatives to Laboratory Animals - ATLA

Download latest issue button Download back issues button Subscribe to ATLA
Contact Us

Tel icon

Tel: +44 (0)115 9584740

Tel icon

Fax: +44 (0)115 9503570

Make an Enquiry

Comment: Welfare Implications of Standardised Protocols for Phenotyping and Genotyping Genetically Altered Mice

Nirmala Bhogal and Michelle Scrivens

Phenotype-driven mouse mutagenesis programmes are widely advocated as a means of assigning functions to human genes. These programmes often give rise to a number of animal welfare concerns, not least the large numbers of animals that are used. Here, we consider how the phenotyping screens used in all such programmes can be improved, with specific reference to the standard phenotyping procedures described by the European Mouse Phenotyping Resource of Standardised Screens (EMPReSS). Although we commend the efforts of the Consortium in developing standardised screens for phenotyping, animal welfare should take precedence over technical ease and the cost implications of the research. A number of recommendations are made that could reduce the suffering of the mice used in such studies. These include the use of minimally invasive practices, reduced sample sizes, and combining the assays used in such studies.

Full text pdf 36(5), 599–612